Is that the UN that has no access to the facilities right RB?
Cause if that's the case, which it is, they would only have the word of people who have either been released, or lawyers of said detainee's. What is the legal standing of word by second party people? Hear say? I can't imagine any people in Gitmo having an agenda. No that can't be possible.
Wait a second, I am vaguely remembering some incident about alleged desecration of the Quran by America MP's.... oh wait that's right it was actually a detainee, who actually managed to stir up quite a bit of trouble regarding the whole situation. Say didn't the insatiable need to show the American government, oh wait it was the detainee's, desecration, lead to deaths of people around the world?
Wait that could never happen. Because Al Qaeda isn't well versed in the art of propaganda.., wait a second, here is a little tidbit the old google hooked up for me, Manchester Doucments anybody, those documents that were seized from Al Qaeda operatives? A terrorists "how to guide".
It's all in PDF form so I guess you'll have to trust me that the link is legit...
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/jihadmanual.html
This would be the section regarding detention.
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/jihad18chap1.html
How in a million years would Al Qaeda ever figure that citing mistreatment would garner them support, or at the very least anti-American sentiment, the tired liberal "America is evil and torturing babies while sodomizing baby seals" line.
Puh-leaze.