Quote:
|
We all know alqaeda thinks anything not fundamentally muslim is a legitimate target. What I'm arguing as opinion is the rational used to paint the picture of alqaedas rational. To be more clear - that the CIA and FBI have offices in the WTC etc, etc. They don't need any of that. We're infidels, thats all they need. the rest is opinion.
|
And so what's wrong with making some tactical assumptions? If it were a history class about WWII, it might be reasonable to say that the War in North Africa was conducted by Rommel and Montgomery in order to secure oil reserves for their respective countries. Yes it might be opinion, but it's not a political one is it?
Are you saying that he should ignore the reasons why the bombers did such atrocious things? Or that we shouldn't try to figure out why they did it? Or that we should believe that they just see us as infidels? Is thinking about different motivations they might have had, displaying a politically biased opinion? Something that could get someone fired?