the third link actually presented something I view as worthy of discussion and concern.
while not censorship in the way you and other conservatives have rendered the word in past discussions, I certainly don't agree with firing an editor over offensive content. that's unfortuant and dangerous trajectory, in my opinion. the irony is that he usual response is that people should protest and boycott, that's the consumer's right to do and appropriate. but the previous two examples you chose to use as censorship, whatever. anyway, I'd hope you be more consistent in the future with your stance. the last link would have supported your argument without making you appear to be a chump just trying to stir the pot. my two replies wouldn't have been so abrasive if you hadn't been looking like you were just doing the same old tired crap of the past.
__________________
"The theory of a free press is that truth will emerge from free discussion, not that it will be presented perfectly and instantly in any one account." -- Walter Lippmann
"You measure democracy by the freedom it gives its dissidents, not the freedom it gives its assimilated conformists." -- Abbie Hoffman
|