View Single Post
Old 03-03-2006, 06:49 PM   #36 (permalink)
analog
Banned
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by genuinegirly
I'm sorry, in my state, he is legally considered a pedophile. He would be on the Megan's Law website with a big fat "Rape and illicit acts with a CHILD under the age of 18". Karma says it was coming to him. As it will to anyone else who does this kind of senseless crap.
No, you're incorrect, he is not considered a pedophile- either in California, or in the law of any state in this country. He COULD be charged with statutory rape, under current CALIFORNIA law- but your problem is that this didn't happen in your state, so I don't know what your gripe is.

It fell under Wisconsin law, in which he has committed no crime. I might note, as have others, that age of consent is different all over the world. Here in the states, it goes all the way down to 16 in several states for females, and down to 14 in a few states for males. The stats are widely available for your perusal, so I suggest you do that research before you insist I shot you down with incorrect information.

Quote:
I would like some real dialogue here. I would like the opportunity to gain an open mind about this one.

But the way the current conversation is going, none of that will happen.
The current conversation is fine, save for your calling people pedophiles who aren't pedophiles by ANYONE's definition of the term except your own (which obviously doesn't count), and wishing death on people. When you take such an egregiously incorrect stance against the facts of law, based on your own moral agenda, people are going to point out how incredibly factually wrong you are, and rightly question the basis of your erronious, and offensive argument.

Bottom line is- your opinions about the act of pedophilia are incorrect based on both the definition used in criminal psychology to specify the mental processes known as pedophilia, and as compared to the law of every state in this country governing what defines a criminal act of pedophilia. The law you assert he's guilty of statutory rape under is a California age of consent law, not a Wisonsin age of consent law, and the incident took place in Wisconsin. Furthermore, wishing death on someone or asserting that their death was deserved is the blatant result of your personal moral agenda, and you will be held to account for such harsh opinions/judgments.

Last edited by analog; 03-03-2006 at 06:55 PM..
analog is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360