just checking: is there some kind of linkage being made between the evaluation of the situation and iraq--specifically on the question of how to interpret the events of the past week or so, since the bombing of the golden mosque--and one's position on the war in general?
how does this work exactly?
it would seem to me that going down this route would make all judgements about iraq non-falsifiable because there is no need for any information to be involved.
all the work is done a priori.
what would be the point of that?
__________________
a gramophone its corrugated trumpet silver handle
spinning dog. such faithfulness it hear
it make you sick.
-kamau brathwaite
|