View Single Post
Old 02-26-2006, 08:37 PM   #28 (permalink)
politicophile
Addict
 
politicophile's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by hannukah harry
actually, i have to disagree with you. you're techinically right, but many states still have anti-abortion laws on the books. so as soon as roe v. wade is overturned, those go back into effect. i think i read that when roe was originally decided, abortion was illegal in like 45 or 48 states. some may have made it legal, some may have removed the old ones, but i bet most would revert back to the old laws and make it illegal immediately.
This is a good point and one that I had overlooked. You are absolutely right that any currently unconstitutional state abortion bans would be reactivated if Roe were overturned. I do suspect, however, that such bans would be taken off the books if it looked like Roe was headed back to the Supreme Court. It just seems impossible that abortion would be banned in places like California, Washington, New York, etc.

The very worst thing that can happen in constitutional law is for the Court to completely reverse its position: doing so is a blow to the rule of law. The question then becomes: what do you do if the precident is really, really bad? Does anyone really think that Brown v. Board was a bad decision?

Here is the position I find myself in: Griswold invented a right to privacy that absolutely does not exist in the Constitution. If the states wanted to amend the Constitution and add such a right, they could do so. There has been no such amendment, however, so the right continues to not exist. Thus, Roe v. Wade is based on totally faulty precident. The federal judiciary should never have taken it upon itself to regulate a practice that falls squarely in the domain of state legislatures.

BUT: Roe has been on the books for all of my lifetime, plus an additional thirteen years. The instability created by overruling it would be terrible. A cornerstone of our society is stability of law: Locke discusses it, as does Montesquieu.

This bill, should it reach the Supreme Court, will have a massive impact on Constitutional Law in our nation. And yet I remain torn as to what outcome I would prefer.
__________________
The peculiar evil of silencing the expression of an opinion is, that it is robbing the human race; posterity as well as the existing generation; those who dissent from the opinion, still more than those who hold it. If the opinion is right, they are deprived of the opportunity of exchanging error for truth: if wrong, they lose, what is almost as great a benefit, the clearer perception and livelier impression of truth, produced by its collision with error. ~John Stuart Mill, On Liberty
politicophile is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360