View Single Post
Old 02-22-2006, 11:20 AM   #24 (permalink)
TexanAvenger
Born-Again New Guy
 
TexanAvenger's Avatar
 
Location: Unfound.
Quote:
Originally Posted by SecretMethod70
I am of the opinion that, no, amorous love is not limited. Much like a parent can have multiple children and love each of them, but love each differently, I think that one can feel amorous love with more than one person at the same time and, again, it is unique to each person. It is likely that the feelings of amorous love will be more intense toward one person over others, but I don't think that the love towards that person is necessarily diminished by the presence of amorous love towards others. I also don't think that the more intense love is in any way "better" or "more serious" than the love for others, just different, and perhaps more important to the person feeling love.

Clearly, just because amorous love for one does not require lessened amorous love for another, I don't think that means that all people are capable of sustaining relationships in which amorous love is felt for and directed towards more than one person. Without profound levels of communication and openness on the part of all persons, it would be nearly impossible to sustain such a situation. It seems to me, though, that most people believe it is not just difficult but impossible for one to fall into amorous love with someone else while maintaining the amorous love and bond with an already existing significant other. This is not something I agree with, but I'm interested to hear your thoughts.
As I stated in another thread, I go back and forth on my opinion as to whether or not I am capable of handling multiple instances of amorous love. There are times that I look back and wonder if I didn't already experience that, but didn't acknowledge it at the time because at said time I considered that inherently wrong.

But regardless of my personal experience with it, I don't believe that love, even amorous love, is limited in either how much you can give to people or how many people you can give it to. While I question the ability of some (maybe most) to rise above their jealousy in the face of multiple cases of amorous love, I do not question the existance of that love. It is the thing country songs and soliloquies have been written about for years. People may not know how to deal with or comprehend it, or just outright misunderstand it in a culture like ours where absolute monogamy is valued above any other lifestyle, but I believe people feel it all the time.

I think few people would argue with me that new love is often more thrilling, more heated than a love that has had some time to build and 'cool.' It is the illusion of these new 'hot' loves seeming to overshadow established loves that leads people to believe that one loves must come at the expense of others. I would like to look at love with kind of a 'heno-amorous' approach. Just because one love exists in a large way does not preclude all other loves from existing, or even necessarily confine them to a lower rung, it simply means that this love does exist too.

It would be an amazing feat in my mind if the majority of people suddenly came over to this state of mind, and I doubt that it society as a whole will reach a point any time soon where this thinking seems beneficial. However, I have no problem with people practicing it on a case by case basis. My only hope is that when people do openly admit to loving more than one person at a time, people around them can at least have the humanity to support them instead of bashing them on principle.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ustwo
I know more teachers into this sort of thing than any other profession, have to figure that out some day
For the record, I want to teach high school English. Add one to the count.

Last edited by TexanAvenger; 02-22-2006 at 11:23 AM..
TexanAvenger is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360