View Single Post
Old 02-21-2006, 07:55 AM   #14 (permalink)
ratbastid
Darth Papa
 
ratbastid's Avatar
 
Location: Yonder
Quote:
Originally Posted by Supple Cow
Has anybody here who is in a polyamorous situation that is primary-secondary in nature thought about evolving into an "all-primary" situation as I've suggested? If so, what keeps you from letting a secondary relationship become primary as well - is it because there is less potential for the closeness/love with the secondary person(s) than there is with the primary person(s), or is it because there is some other kind of practical complication or roadblock such as a pre-existing marriage (or equivalent emotional commitment) with the primary person(s)?
Currently, I have a primary partner (lurkette), and secondary (D), her husband (S), and a girl I rarely but enthusiastially fool around with who lives in a different state, and her husband. That's the extent of my "poly family", if you will. I include my partners' husbands because they're a really important part of the equation. There are plenty of people that lurkette and I flirt with, are interested in, whatever, but those aren't "relationships". Although the arrangement we have wouldn't at all preclude those becoming relationships.

For a brief time, lurkette and D&S and I were talking about moving in together. There was a big house on the market that had been a duplex, but was converted to one big single-family home. We had this fantasy of moving in there, raising their kid(s) together, being public about our relationship, etc. It was nice to think about, but I'm not sure we were ever really serious about that--lurkette may have been, but I don't think the rest of us were. D & S are both teachers, and it would be very detrimental to their careers for it to be known that they're in a non-traditional relationship. Frankly, living with the two of them would have driven me nuts--I love them, but I really only want to live with lurkette.

There absolutely ARE poly relationships out there that don't include notions of "primary" and "secondary". There are as many different poly configurations as there are poly relationships. Some people don't differentiate between their partners. There are poly people who feel that having the primary/secondary distinction isn't "real" polyamory. So... it's all over the map. There's really no rule. That's the basical deal about poly--it's however you say it is. Once you've broken out of society's handed-down monogamy rules, you have the freedom to create pretty much anything.
ratbastid is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360