View Single Post
Old 02-20-2006, 06:42 AM   #1 (permalink)
SecretMethod70
Human
 
SecretMethod70's Avatar
 
Administrator
Location: Chicago
Is love a limited resource?

I was reading the thread, Relationship Advice Please, and the concept of "emotional cheating" is one which I find very interesting. Not because I don't think it exists: if one is forming an emotional bond with another and is hiding it from their partner, that's clearly cheating and there is clearly a sense of guilt in it. There is no question in my mind that what has occurred in the original thread should be considered a serious issue. It is one particular comment that I found interesting in that thread though (emphasis mine):
Quote:
Originally Posted by :::OshnSoul:::
I find that if an SO got attached either emotionally or physically with someone else, it is a level of cheating. A part of them, whether big or small, has detached from the relationship.
Is this really true? Obviously, it is true in some relationships, perhaps many. What I'm interested in, though, is whether or not you think being emotionally attached to someone other than your significant other requires being LESS emotionally attached to your significant other. This idea seems to stem from the idea that love is a limited resource: that by having feelings of love for another person, it requires "taking away from" your feelings of love for your significant other.

Obviously, the kind of love one has for a friend, or for a family member, is different than the kind of love one has for a significant other. To make the distinction simple, let's refer to the love one has for friends and family as platonic love and the love one has for a significant other as amorous love. Also, the love one has for a significant other is unique to the person. Anyone who has felt love in more than one relationship can tell you this. But - and this is what I would like to hear thoughts on - is it only possible to truly have amorous love for one person at a time? Does the formation of amorous love for another person inevitably mean that one's amorous love for their significant other is diminished?

I am of the opinion that, no, amorous love is not limited. Much like a parent can have multiple children and love each of them, but love each differently, I think that one can feel amorous love with more than one person at the same time and, again, it is unique to each person. It is likely that the feelings of amorous love will be more intense toward one person over others, but I don't think that the love towards that person is necessarily diminished by the presence of amorous love towards others. I also don't think that the more intense love is in any way "better" or "more serious" than the love for others, just different, and perhaps more important to the person feeling love.

Clearly, just because amorous love for one does not require lessened amorous love for another, I don't think that means that all people are capable of sustaining relationships in which amorous love is felt for and directed towards more than one person. Without profound levels of communication and openness on the part of all persons, it would be nearly impossible to sustain such a situation. It seems to me, though, that most people believe it is not just difficult but impossible for one to fall into amorous love with someone else while maintaining the amorous love and bond with an already existing significant other. This is not something I agree with, but I'm interested to hear your thoughts.
__________________
Le temps détruit tout

"Musicians are the carriers and communicators of spirit in the most immediate sense." - Kurt Elling
SecretMethod70 is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360