Quote:
Originally Posted by aceventura3
Very few small business need the SBA program for start-up. In most cases banks would loan the money anyway when a person can meet the conditions for an SBA loan. And, the SBA program pretty much just shifts the risk of giving the loan from the bank to the government. The program actually enrichs big banks more than it does small business owners. The small business owner puts business and personal assets on the line, the bank nothing, and they get a guarnateed return. The program is smoke and mirrors, it has no real value and adds no value to the business owner. It just requires more paperwork, and creates jobs for SBA employees. Just like in Vegas, you want to be the house. In the SBA program you want to be the bank.
People went to college before the student loan programs and would continue going if the program stopped. People generally pay market rates for the loans anyway, so what is the point of it being in a government program. The private sector can handle student loans. A teenager in college can get credit cards, no government. A teenager can get a car loan, no government. You don'r think they could get a student loan with no government?
Also, you can't "give" someone an education. They have to earn it, they have to work for it. You create the illusion that all government has to do is tax the rich and "give" poor people an education and everything will be fine. at some point the people who want it, have to put in an effort. They have to make sacrifices. they have to show they want it, they have to prove it is important.
Also, just because you use key word over and over doesn't mean you are supporting your argument. I love a good debate, all I look for is substance and logic. Saying we can tax the rich and give to the poor means virtually nothing to me, because it doesn't work.
|
Yet Corporate welfare and the tax cuts to where fortune 500 companies pay nothing, the farm aid to billionaires abusing the system, ATPs..... yeah FREE FUCKING TAX DOLLARS TO THE RICH AND BIG BUSINESS BUT BLAME AND CUT THE PROGRAMS THAT HELP THE POOR...... makes sense.
Tax cuts for the rich and Free money for the rich and hopefully it'll trickle down..... I love that word "TRICKLE"....... lol it means slow and barely there.
But the GOP Neocons love Trickle down and cutting social programs while Sen. Spector gives his aides spouse MILLIONS of our tax dollars. While government gives BILLIONS to billion dollar corporations that pay their workers shit but pay their CEO's Millions not to mention their perks.
You and I disagree wayyyyyyyy too much and I get too emotional to talk about this because when you research it you see the rich getting fucking government money handed to them on silver platters and the poor blamed and having the programs that help them cut.
And people like you either buy into the bullshit or like blaming the poor and truly don't give a damn as long as you have yours. Because I have mentioned the above "perks" to the rich and all you and the neocons do is make excuses. It's ok to cut the services to the poor but don't touch the rich's perks.... yet the same arguments you have for the cutting of the poor's help could very well apply to the rich.... but NOOOOOOOOOO that can't happen. The money the rich get supposedly goes into the economy to help the poor....... lol like helping the poor with loans and education would hurt the economy.
I can't argue this because there's no meeting point. You refuse to acknowledge the programs to the rich need cut, and that the poor deserve shit.