Maybe I'm just perpetually hammered, but UsTwo's post made perfect sense to me. The idea that abortions should be limited is a part of of the anti-life, argument, in almost every case. There lies the agony in the sense I took it. Not meant on an individual case specific level, I think he meant most anyone who argue the philosophy itself. If you have a problem with the # of abortions, it would seem you have a problem with the idea of abortions. If it's inherantly "more" than pregnancy prevention such as condom use, what else other than a taking of a life could it be?
Not to speak for anyone or anything, my two drunken cents.
Last edited by matthew330; 02-16-2006 at 09:35 PM..
|