Here's an idea Kostya... how about instead of mearly trying to win an argument by wielding your (quite obvious) superior intellect, why don't you dumb it down a little so we can actually understand what your saying and retort as to facilitate an argument. This seems to be breeding a one-sided argument (I'm pretty sure those last few diatribes went over even dlishsguy's head). Not having a go at you mate, just asking for more of a layman's description of what you are trying to get across. I'm interested as you obviously do a fair bit of research before forging an opinion, and seeing as yours and my own opinion have differed greatly in the past I'd like to get my point across, something I find hard when I don't really know what you're going on about in the first place. I'm guessing I'm not Robinson Caruso on this one...
__________________
What's easier to believe: that a guy was born without sex in the manner of several Greek demigods and grew up to be able to transmute liquids and alter his body density yet couldn't escape government execution, or that three freemasons in a vehicle made with aluminum foil in an era before digital technology escaped our atmosphere, landing on the moon, broadcasted from there, and then flew back without burning up?
Last edited by Meridae'n; 02-14-2006 at 11:13 PM..
|