View Single Post
Old 02-10-2006, 10:10 PM   #67 (permalink)
Trisk
Insane
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by pigglet
ummm...if I find an incredibly gorgeous woman, who is also mentally challenged and has limited capacity to make her own decisions and says "yes" to any question I ask her...am I free to ask her "can I have sex you?" and pending the "yes" hop on break it down? I would compare that level of consent to the type of consent that a horse can provide in this circumstance.

how about child molestation? a child can give consent, but does it mean anything in this sense?

and me, i'd feel pretty bad about having sex with a mentally challenged girl, who technically consented. i think i might even feel like i'd raped her.

I really just can't see equating horsefucking, in any sense, with fucking a person of the same sex, or multiple people at once...
Well put, Pigglet.

Quote:
The difference between this and your examples are the fact that yours involve humans. Animals are under different laws. If you want to kill your pets you can, if done in a 'humane' way. Live stock is slaughtered and eaten and we wear their skin. As long as the animal wasn't hurt, what harm was done to it? Does it feel violated and unclean in the animal kingdom? Does it no longer enjoy sex with other horses due to the trauma? Animals are not retarded people, nor do we treat them as such in any case but apparently this.

This is an interesting subject to play devils advocate on as it shows even the most tolerant of people become intolerant once they find their 'ick' factor.
I don't understand what you and others are trying to say here. It seems like everyone is so afraid to say bestiality is wrong because it would mean homosexuality is wrong. I'm sorry, but since when are laws made by humans the deciding factors in all world issues? We are not gods (regardless of what some of us would like to think). Take a look at the effects we've made on the world around us doing things that are legal (read: pollution, extinction, depleting natural resources and rich lands...I think you get the point). Honestly, I wouldn't quote laws in the US as reasons why bestiality is right. Laws can be changed and don't encompass everything.

Furthermore, there are people who believe that animals should not be killed for food or coats, and while, yes, animals can be killed in a humane way, why should it be our decision when other living beings on the planet live or die?
...And why, if we consider it "humane" to kill animals in pain and misery, is it inhumane to kill humans in the same or worse conditions?
I'm not trying to start a debate on that, but I'm trying to make a point that the law is really just about morals or opinions of the lawmaker at the time. There are many different opinions and outlooks on these things. Who can say which is correct? Laws get changed all the time.

I have to add that, a) You can't take away an animal's ability to get pleasure from sex becuase most animals don't get pleasure from sex.
b) Yeah, animals are not retarded people. That's true. But Homosexual people are not animals either. I really just don't think you can make a comparison between SANE, thinking individuals who can speak to us and either retarded people OR animals(who may not be insane, but have no way of communicating whether they want to have sex with us or not. Even if that male horse brought out his penis, who's to say he wanted to have sex with the man? Have any of you guys ever gotten an erection from a girl who you didn't actually have any desire to have sex with? The right stimulation can do wonders).


Which brings me to my next point: to whoever said that horses can't be forced to do anything. Um, yeah, maybe if you try to move a horse by leaning on it or something, but...if you can't force it to do anything, what do you think we're doing when riding and training them?
Just like humans, I'm pretty sure other animals can be coaxed into having sexual reactions from the right stimulation. Yet I'm pretty sure MOST horses don't go rushing over to mount human beings every time they see one. If they WERE consenting individuals who WANTED to have sex with the human, don't you think they might make the first moves once in a while? Don't you think someone would notice if horses were running around raping humans?
Trisk is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360