Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Ustwo
Now as for strongarming it sure is, but how is it counter productive to a representative democracy?
|
A representative in a representative democracy is supposed to represent the best interests of his or her constituants, yes? According to every poll I've seen, at least a majority of people are concerned about the wire tapping issue, so much so in fact that the word "impeachment" has been thrown around not only by far lefties, but even several notable conservatives. This means that a group of people, those who have questions but not answers about the wire tapping (whether the questions are of the legal or ethical issue) should be represented in our goverment. If republican representatives in addition to independant and democrat are ready to voice their concern about the wire taps, the issue must be tabled. The president cannot have the power to strongarm the legislative branch. It is a clear breach of checks and balances.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Ustwo
Bush is an the elected representative of the American people, a majority supported his agenda in the last election. It is his job to move that agenda forward. There is nothing outside of the realm of a representative democracy in not supporting people who do not support you. This really is Bush growing up to political realities, in his first term he tried to work with his enemies and got nothing but daggers in his back in return. This time you make sure they know what side they are on.
|
Bush's approval rating is quite telling. When he was elected, he basically have an approval rating of just above 50%, which is enough to secure his presidencey...barely. Now, his approval rating
continues to drop, and his disapproval rating continues to rise. This is a clear symptom of his not representing the people. This is a sign that he should NOT stay his course. He should reform his agenda.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Ustwo
So keep your hat firmly on your head.
|
It's in the closet, but I get your meaning.