Quote:
|
Originally Posted by meembo
You can't deny that hands down someone's pants isn't sexual in nature.
|
How can we be sure? Let's say hypothetically that you have a 7 year old son right now. He goes to school and puts his hands down a little girls pants. When you get him home and talk to him - i.e. "Why did you do that?" - he simply responds with a shrug. Are you sure that this is sexual in nature? Or could it simply be recognition of a taboo surrounding sexuality and simply wishing to utilize the shock effect of the action being taboo? I suspect that it could simply be that he recognises that the effect of such an action will be attention, and therefore the reward for the action would be attention, not of sexual gratification.
Edit: I'm assuming the double negative in your sentence was unintentional.