View Single Post
Old 02-07-2006, 03:55 PM   #8 (permalink)
percy
Addict
 
I don't see it as a big deal. Wasting billions of dollars and treating the Canadian public as pissants I see as a big deal, that courtesy of the Liberals. Also, where is the outrage at David Dingwalls severance that was kept under wraps, again by the Liberals. Possible majority if that would have surface during the final week of the elections some say. And before we compare the old boss with the new boss, let's hope the new boss has some honesty and integrity, something sorely lacking from the previous boss.


Tories claim Liberal deception in compensation award to Dingwall

By JIM BROWN

OTTAWA (CP) - The incoming Conservative government say they are powerless to stop a hefty settlement with ousted Mint boss David Dingwall announced in the final hours before Paul Martin was due to leave office.

The $417,780 award was based on the findings of an independent arbitrator who concluded that Dingwall, contrary to past claims by the Martin government, was forced out of his job and didn't leave voluntarily.

Neither PCO nor Dingwall's lawyers would elaborate on the reasons for that conclusion. The detailed ruling by arbitrator George Adams, a retire judge of Ontario Superior Court, was not made public.

Tory MP Jason Kenney insisted the Liberals knew about the compensation award on Jan. 20 - three days before election day - and sat on it to avoid political embarrassment.

"I believe that could have been the difference between a Conservative minority and a majority," Kenney said Sunday on CTV's Question Period.

"This was a cover-up that affected the result of the election - and I think in a way subverted democracy.,"

Jay Hill, another Conservative MP, suggested Dingwall or others might be called before a parliamentary committee to explain the situation.


"We can only be left to surmise what difference it would have made if they had been honest with Canadians and had this come out on the Friday before the Monday election," said Hill.

Bob Quinn, a spokesman for the Privy Council Office, said it's true that lawyers for the government and for Dingwall were notified of the arbitrator's ruling on Jan. 20.

But he said the decision was not passed along to Martin or his prime ministerial aides until after voting day.

"Mr Martin and his staff knew that discussions between the government lawyers and Mr. Dingwall's lawyers were ongoing," said Quinn.

"They didn't know anything about the outcome of the process prior to the election. They didn't even know it had gone to binding arbitration."

Martin and his Conservative successor, Stephen Harper, were finally notified of the ruling simultaneously after the campaign was over, said Quinn, although he couldn't name a precise date.

He said the decision to go to arbitration as made by Alex Himelfarb, the clerk of the Privy Council, on the advice of Justice Department lawyers after negotiations with Dingwall's legal team broke down.

The clerk did not consult Martin or his staff on the decision, said Quinn.

Dingwall resigned from his $277,000-a-year-job as mint president in September after a prolonged controversy about his six-figure office expense account.

A subsequent review by PricewaterhouseCoopers accounting firm concluded his spending was within the rules with minor discrepancies.

But Harper, in a statement issued Saturday, said the Liberals had misled MPs and the public about details of the affair.

"After months of evasive answers in the House of Commons, we have now learned that David Dingwall's departure from the Royal Canadian Mint was involuntary," said the prime minister-designate.

"This is contrary to the information given by the Liberal government. I am very disappointed that Parliament was misled on this matter."

William Stairs, Harper's director of communications, said it appears the incoming government will have to live with the compensation award.

"It's very unlikely there's anything we can do given that, as we understand it, this (decision) has the force of a court order," said Stairs.

He couldn't't say whether they new government would at least be able to make the full arbitration ruling public to shed light on the reasons for the award.

Dingwall was at the centre of controversy for weeks last fall after reports that his office had run up expenses of almost $748,000 in 2004.

There was particular outrage after reports that he had put in an expense claim for a pack of chewing gum. Opposition MPs alleged he had used taxpayers as his "personal ATM."

His defence of "I'm entitled to my entitlements" was picked up by the Tories and used in campaign ads to hammer Martin and the Grits with accusations of arrogance.

Then-revenue minister John McCallum insisted last fall that Dingwall - who had sided with Jean Chretien in his long-running Liberal leadership war with Martin - offered voluntarily to step down from the mint and wasn't fired by the Martin government.

McCallum also insisted that any compensation paid would be the minimum legally required.

In a statement Sunday, Dingwall's lawyers said he is satisfied with the arbitration ruling and "pleased that the government is complying with its legal obligations."
http://cnews.canoe.ca/CNEWS/Canada/2...426125-cp.html

Last edited by percy; 02-07-2006 at 03:57 PM..
percy is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360