Quote:
|
Originally Posted by shakran
I dunno. You tell me. You don't find it remotely troubling that the maker of the machines promised to deliver a hotly contested state to Bush and, despite exit polls indicating otherwise, Bush won the state?
Hell break that one down. You don't find it remotely troublling that the maker of the machines promised to deliver the state to any specific candidate?
|
Along with Dem districts where Bush's polling numbers were down having more votes than voters and Bush winning those districts, even though polls had him losing those by more than 5%? Or the fact GOP Blackwell threw out 1,000's upon 1000's of voter registrations?
So yes, there are serious questions right now about ANY legitimacy of the voting in Ohio.
And as I said if it is a close race and DEM districts again show more votes than voters and the polls had the Dem winning in that district...... there will be no doubt in my mind. Nor should there be in anyone else's.
I don't think anyone who does not live in Ohio or has no true knowledge of what goes on in this state should be accusing anyone living here seeing it, reading about it, hearing about it, living it, as being paranoid or conspiritorial.
Especially when it is a proven fact the majority of the GOP heirarchy was involved with Noe and Abramhoff and to this day, even with evidence proving otherwise, they claim innocence and not really knowing Noe. Yet, they all took money from him, they all elected him to be in the office and to invest the Workers Comp monies. Yet, we're supposed to trust these people to run fair elections?
We shall see, we shall see.