Quote:
Originally Posted by shakran
We *elected* Bush in 2004. He was *appointed* in 2000.
And frankly, the 2004 election is suspect. He won by a hair's breadth (50.7% of the popular vote is hardly a "mandate"), and he only won because he carried Ohio AND Florida. Florida has well documented election-day problems, and Ohio used machines supplied by a man who promised to deliver Ohio for Bush.
But you don't see suspicions or investigations like that in the "liberal" media, do you?
|
Since he was "only elected in 2004," he's eligible for another term, right?