Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community - View Single Post

maleficent · 01-19-2006, 02:57 PM

The subpoena is here:

http://news.com.com/2300-1028_3-6028780-1.html

http://www.itworld.com/Man/2681/060119govtvsgoogle/

Quote:

US government wrestles Google for search records
IDG News Service 1/19/06

Juan Carlos Peréz, IDG News Service, Miami Bureau
The U.S. government is asking a California court to force Google Inc. to turn over information about usage of the company's search engine for finding pornography on the Internet.

The government says it needs those Google usage records to prepare its defense in a lawsuit brought against it by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU). But Google is resisting.

Thus, U.S. Attorney General Alberto Gonzales on Wednesday filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California a motion to compel Google to comply with the government's subpoena.

The ACLU lawsuit, filed in 1998, challenges the Child Online Protection Act (COPA) law, which aims to protect minors from the effects of exposure to sexually explicit material on the Internet.

Nicole Wong, Google's associate general counsel, said in a prepared statement e-mailed to IDG News Service: "Google is not a party to this lawsuit and their demand for information overreaches. We had lengthy discussions with them to try to resolve this, but were not able to and we intend to resist their motion vigorously."

The ACLU's challenge to the COPA, arguing that it violates the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, has been so far successful. The Pennsylvania district court in which the lawsuit was filed granted the ACLU's motion for preliminary injunction, and an appeals court affirmed it in 2000.

The case went to the U.S. Supreme Court, which vacated the judgment of the appeals court and sent it back to that court, which in turn again affirmed the preliminary injunction. The Supreme Court again reviewed the case, but that time it affirmed the preliminary injunction and sent the case back for trial.

Now the government is preparing its defense of COPA's constitutionality, and is specifically trying to buttress its contention that the law is more effective than filtering software in protecting minors from pornographic material on the Internet, according to the motion.

As a result, the government has issued subpoenas to Google and other search engines requesting information to make its case. But Google has refused to comply with the two requests. One request is that Google provide the government with a "random sample" of 1 million Web site addresses found in Google's search engine index and the other is that it provide the government with the text of all queries filed on the search engine during a specific week.

"The production of those materials would be of significant assistance to the Government's preparation of its defense of the constitutionality of this important statute," the motion filed reads. This information would help the government understand how often Web users encounter material considered "harmful to minors" as a result of using a search engine, and to determine how effective filtering software is, according to the motion.

The motion doesn't name the other search engine operators whose records were subpoenaed, but it indicates that they complied with the request.

http://www.themilwaukeechannel.com/t...69/detail.html

Quote:

SAN JOSE, Calif. -- A lawyer at Google says it will vigorously fight a government demand for information on what its customers have been searching for.

The Bush administration has subpoenaed details on what Google's users find through its popular Internet search engine.

Papers filed by the Justice Department on Wednesday in California say Google refused to comply with a subpoena last year. The feds asked for a range of material from Google's databases, including a request for 1 million random Web addresses and records of all Google searches from any one-week period

The government said it needs the data to learn how often online searches find pornography. Officials said they need that information to help revive an Internet child protection law the Supreme Court shot down two years ago.

Google promises to protect personal information. But the company's privacy policy says it complies with legal and government requests.

http://news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/g...oog11806m.html

Quote:

Gonzales v. Google, Inc.
The U.S. Department of Justice filed a motion in federal court seeking a court order that would compel search engine company Google, Inc. to turn over “a multi-stage random sample of one million URL’s” from Google’s database, and a computer file with “the text of each search string entered onto Google’s search engine over a one-week period (absent any information identifying the person who entered such query.”

(January 18, 2006)