Quote:
|
Originally Posted by blahblah454
For the life of my I can not understand why people would want to remove it... it is something we are born with and have had ever since humans were humans. And for those of you who say it doesnt change anything, yes it does. The amount of feeling you would loose would be insane. Having your penis constantly rub against your pants must kill so much feeling, essentialy creating a calluse over the most sensative part of the males body.
Anyways when the time comes for me to have children there is NO WAY that I would ever have this sugury done to them.
|
Did you actually READ this thread? First you say, definitively, that is does change things. Then you say very uncertainly that is "must kill so much feeling". This shows that you don't know. Are you cut? If so, were you at birth? If you are uncut, you don't know. If you are cut, and were so at birth, you don't know. If you were uncut and became cut in life after you began having sex, you may know, but that is also questionable, as my previous posts have stated. If I lost my right hand, I'd start masturbating with my left. It wouldn't be as good. I can therefore say that left-handed people must not enjoy masturbation as much. Conclusively, this makes no sense.
Someone PROVE that cut men enjoy sex less than uncut men. Loss of nerves? Maybe some are lost, more likely the body adapts and developing nerves develop elsewhere. Keratination, callous and other similar terms? I don't experience that. Other cut men here don't seem to. Are there pictures? Case studies? Can anyone show me PROOF of this occuring? I'm happy to post a medical study picture of my penis. It's fine. It's not scared, abnormal, curved, inverted, calloused, cracked and bleeding, keratinized (beyond what any exposed flesh is). It's soft, sensitive skin that reacts favorably during sexual situations. My wife likes it. My previous partners have enjoyed it. Why is this SUCH a problem to some people. It's not a limb. It's skin. Sheesh!