As I said above, under a strict definition, number 3 applies. Even stricter, number 1 applies. The foreskin can arguably be said to be essential to the natural function of the penis.
I can't believe that anyone would argue a circumsized penis is a penis in its natural state. Circumcision is the process of altering the penis from its natural state whether that state is beneficial or unecessary is what is under debate here).
__________________
"My hands are on fire. Hands are on fire. Ain't got no more time for all you charlatans and liars."
- Old Man Luedecke
|