|
As has been said It's unnecessary.
To me it is equivalent to cutting off our childrens pinky fingers and toes, because, hey, they are unnecessary, and doing so lowers their chance of developing PINKY cancer or hurting their PINKY or sticking their pinky in their ass, not washing their hands, and comming down with a case of STINKY PINKY!
Also, to prevent confusion, the most common form of female circumcision is almost completely analogous to male circumcision...it is just the removal of the clitoral hood.
And yet one is mutilation and the other "normal" here.
Also, for the parents who want it done to their son when they are young because THEY had it done...why not let the child decide when he is an adult? Shouldn't it be his decision? You know those parents you've heard about who pierced their baby's ears or nose? How'd you react to that? What if a parent decided they wanted to tattoo their baby because it was family tradition?
__________________
This is no sig.
|