Quote:
Originally Posted by stevo
So the count now is 5 for letting the terrorist go free or should I round up to 10?
to answer you, rekna, I'd really just have to quote ustwo
Who cares if the law was followed if we're dead?
|
Are you saying that you really thought the Terrorists in Iraq could have ever prevailed against the U.S in a war? The fact that any of them are still ALIVE is a miracle. I mean seriously consider that some of the most effective methods of attacking the U.S that they have are Suicide bombers and Car Bombers... Honestly they dont exactly fight us to begin with.. as most of their battle tactics involve getting themselves killed, to kill anyone else.
Quote:
Originally Posted by pan6467
What about you Libertarians???? How can you support such an obvious violation of the Constitution?
|
Well I am Libertarian... I DONT support this violation. The consitution was meant to protect civil rights and limit/balance govermental powers. Not the other way around.
If evidence is gained by breaking the laws that are proficent (as ours are if followed) it can not be used in court. They should without a doubt release him inless they have some more substantail proof of his guilt other than stuff that they got by violating his constitutional rights.
From what I know, the only thing they could have LEGALY done is held him for 24 hours, then, without any other evidence they would have had to release him.