Quote:
|
Originally Posted by simivin
Well, Malebranche would support the God perspective, certainly. But Hume would disagree, saying that God is as unknowable as the nature of the original question. Especially if you reference "clearly and distinctly perceived" arguments, similar to the whole "seeing is believing" bit. If you think that something cannot be clearly and distinctly perceived -- whether as impression or idea -- and reference God, then there is some uncertainty still, since God's true nature (if He exists) is not clearly and distinctly perceived.
|
True. That is why my uncertainty leads to my belief inGod. And as long as I have uncertainty God will exist to me. I do not understand how those who don't believe in God resolve their uncertainty issue. Perhaps they have found all the answers.
__________________
"Democracy is two wolves and a sheep voting on lunch."
"It is useless for the sheep to pass resolutions on vegetarianism while the wolf is of a different opinion."
"If you live among wolves you have to act like one."
"A lady screams at the mouse but smiles at the wolf. A gentleman is a wolf who sends flowers."
|