|
Well, Malebranche would support the God perspective, certainly. But Hume would disagree, saying that God is as unknowable as the nature of the original question. Especially if you reference "clearly and distinctly perceived" arguments, similar to the whole "seeing is believing" bit. If you think that something cannot be clearly and distinctly perceived -- whether as impression or idea -- and reference God, then there is some uncertainty still, since God's true nature (if He exists) is not clearly and distinctly perceived.
|