Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community - View Single Post - Half Blood Prince Question/theory (spoilers)

chelsea_9 · 12-30-2005, 08:11 PM

i have a theory that Spoiler: dumbledore made snape kill him, hence the complete lack of pleading for his own life. i think that snape is truly working the death eaters, and he killed dumbledore as a way to prove his utmost "loyalty" to voldemort. when in fact, he is still an informant for the otherside, and perhaps an aid for harry when the inevitable and possibly fatal battle against voldemort comes into play. it's just absolutely absurd that dumbledore would be completely wrong about snape. especially now that he's dead, something like that would ruin the way people remember dumbledore. i honestly don't think that snape is on the death eaters side.

also, i've always wondered this about the horcruxes: Spoiler: i was always under the idea that the horcrux was a part of ones soul... and by destroying it would weaken the human that embodies the remaining soul. if thats the case, in theory... harry wouldnt have to destroy all of the horcruxes [since it's quite possible he may be one himself. seeing as though its mentioned often that voldemort may have left some of himself "in" harry the night he survived avadra kedavra] to destroy voldemort. and if he his the final horcrux, he could only have to destroy the remaining ones, which appear to be mainly objects, to destroy voldemort... and then protect himself from followers of the dark lord to prevent him from ever coming back.

i may be way out on left wing there.
but overall, i woudlnt be surprised if everyone was wrong and the lovely mrs. rowling surprised the heck out of us all.

12-30-2005, 08:11 PM	#20 (permalink)
chelsea_9 Crazy Location: somewhere i intend to leave	i have a theory that Spoiler: dumbledore made snape kill him, hence the complete lack of pleading for his own life. i think that snape is truly working the death eaters, and he killed dumbledore as a way to prove his utmost "loyalty" to voldemort. when in fact, he is still an informant for the otherside, and perhaps an aid for harry when the inevitable and possibly fatal battle against voldemort comes into play. it's just absolutely absurd that dumbledore would be completely wrong about snape. especially now that he's dead, something like that would ruin the way people remember dumbledore. i honestly don't think that snape is on the death eaters side. also, i've always wondered this about the horcruxes: Spoiler: i was always under the idea that the horcrux was a part of ones soul... and by destroying it would weaken the human that embodies the remaining soul. if thats the case, in theory... harry wouldnt have to destroy all of the horcruxes [since it's quite possible he may be one himself. seeing as though its mentioned often that voldemort may have left some of himself "in" harry the night he survived avadra kedavra] to destroy voldemort. and if he his the final horcrux, he could only have to destroy the remaining ones, which appear to be mainly objects, to destroy voldemort... and then protect himself from followers of the dark lord to prevent him from ever coming back. i may be way out on left wing there. but overall, i woudlnt be surprised if everyone was wrong and the lovely mrs. rowling surprised the heck out of us all. __________________ all good dreamers pass this way some day hiding behind bottles in dark cafes Last edited by chelsea_9; 12-30-2005 at 08:18 PM..