smooth

I'm not sure how to relate these sentences. Your last sentence looks like a non sequitor as it's not apparent to me how it supports the contention that marxism is hogwash. I also don't understand how "the other way around" would be: you don't want human nature to work best with your government? I don't see how this is false or undesirable.

In any case, it appears that marx' view on changing species is really not critical. There appears to be a mechanism for this in every discipline, even your medical discipline. So the notion that humans are changing over time as bunk is bizarre to me, other than you just wanting to dispute me. But the central tenet of my claim, the reason I made it, that humans change over time and we might just have a new one on our hands seems fairly safe from critique from you. I don't know how you'd go about it, but I'd like to see it.

__________________
"The theory of a free press is that truth will emerge from free discussion, not that it will be presented perfectly and instantly in any one account." -- Walter Lippmann

"You measure democracy by the freedom it gives its dissidents, not the freedom it gives its assimilated conformists." -- Abbie Hoffman