Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Seaver
It was probably the fact that Fox News puts a liberal to counter most of their conservative hosts (Colms to Hannity).
|
There is no liberal on Hannity and Colms. There is an extreme right, and there is a slight right. By comnparison, one may appear left, but he is not an accurate representation of the average person on the left.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Seaver
I can think of PLENTY of crap "scholarship" from the left as well. Professors calling those that died in 9/11 Eichmans is a clear example. Another is the GROSSLY overcalculated innocent dead in the war, by a footnote declaring the war starting in '95 during the bombing campaign in retribution for attacks on Kurds under Clinton, and counting deaths from the embargo onward to today.
|
This is about the UCLA report on media bias. Roach was, with good reason, pointing out that this report is clearly suspect, and that it's obviously written by those who are right leaning. It's a shame that suddenly this isn't about the UCLA report, but about the left exaggerating about Eichmen. Would you like to talk about how Clinton got a bj, too?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Seaver
There are PLENTY of crap "scholarship" being thrown around roachboy, to just point out this one (with little evidence because we dont know the "panel") is just as bad.
|
As stated in numerous posts above, we all know there is media bias. This study is hardly a revelation. Because we already are familiar with the phenomena, we know it when we see it. Roachboy is correct for pointing out the fact that this is almost certianally a work of people who are obviously on the right and wish to distort reality.
Fox News being shown as close to center is PROOF that this study is incorrect. That is all the evidence I need.