View Single Post
Old 12-23-2005, 09:30 AM   #156 (permalink)
Charlatan
Getting it.
 
Charlatan's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: Lion City
I read the report and commented above.

I can agree that we are underspending and would have agreed we are underspending prior to reading this... my disagreement lies in the amount we are underspending and and a fundamental disagreement about the way the world works.

Historically, freedoms are taken by military forces controlled by the ruling powers. Kings maintained their power through military force... in a democracy, it is not as important to squash the will of your people through military might. Is this not one of the reasons the US is so strident about "the right to bear arms?"

The reality of Canada is that we do not need a massive standing army to defend our land from invaders. Unless the US is going to attack... it just isn't going to happen.

I would like to see our Governement live up to its committments of Defense, Diplomacy and Development. We are good at diplomacy and as a relatively neutral nation have served in this function well. We have devoted millions to foreign aid but no where near the .7% goal set out by Prime Minister Pearson in the 60s.

I can appreciate the situation you describe with Chamberlain... it is an old saw that those who want Military soloutions haul out. Sure it makes sense but it ignores the fact that I made above that many of the threats that face North America today are as a result of US military incursion on the rest of the world.

As I said before... it's about balance.

Yes, there are tinpot dictators out there that we should deal with as part of the global community. Canada was there in Rawanda and had we the military might as well as the diplomatic strenght we might have been able to halt the genocide... might.

In the end, I would argue that of Triple D the latter two Ds are the most important. Without development and diplomacy you cannot be successful if you intention is to make the world a better place. Too much emphasis on Military might as a means to solve international issues leads to exactly the problem that the US finds itself in today...

It is this might is right solution that creates the resentment that we are talking about...


So... while yes, we do need to spend more on our military I think the US needs to take a long hard look at their own international policies and the domestic policies that drive them (i.e. unchecked consumption of oil).
__________________
"My hands are on fire. Hands are on fire. Ain't got no more time for all you charlatans and liars."
- Old Man Luedecke
Charlatan is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360