Quote:
|
Originally Posted by host
I already posted a large excerpt from Bush's April 20, 2004 Buffalo speech on this thread, and I linked to it, further excerpted from it, and commented about it in further posts, <b>on this thread</b>.
<b>RB</b>... in your opinion, should I bother to participate here? Do I have to dole my posts out in Macnews style chunkettes...ala USA Today?
Sorry if it seems that I'm picking on you....but you re-posted something that I covered already, quite thoroughly here, along with Gonzales's testimony under oath, which contained similar misleading statements as Bush's April 20, 2004 ones!
|
Link your articles, and simply quote the highlights. I've
never skimmed through one of your posts, but I imagine many have. I know it's bs that you have to do it, but you have to communicate in a style that other people can understand. People are generally too lazy to read a half a dozen articles that support your argument. And you're right to get pissed that the Buffalo speech was ignored in your post, and clearly read in someone elses. I'd be pissed too.