Quote:
|
Originally Posted by ratbastid
Guess what just came to light: Bush not only broke the law, he lied about it.
This is an excerpt from <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2004/04/20040420-2.html#">this April 20, 2004 speech</a>, conveniently posted on the White House website:
That's a lie. At the time he gave this speech, he had already given authorization for court-order-free wiretaps, and he intended to give more such authorizations.
Okay, you big Clinton-dragger-uppers: if lying about getting a blowjob is a high crime or misdemeanor, what do you call it when the President lies about violating his citizen's constitutionally-protected civil rights? Actually, Bush has skipped misdemeanors, and headed straight into felony territory.
Even if you DON'T believe he broke the law, you can't really deny the above public comment is clearly a lie, and about a gravely serious matter. |
I already posted a large excerpt from Bush's April 20, 2004 Buffalo speech on this thread, and I linked to it, further excerpted from it, and commented about it in further posts, <b>on this thread</b>.
<b>RB</b>... in your opinion, should I bother to participate here? Do I have to dole my posts out in Macnews style chunkettes...ala USA Today?
Sorry if it seems that I'm picking on you....but you re-posted something that I covered already, quite thoroughly here, along with Gonzales's testimony under oath, which contained similar misleading statements as Bush's April 20, 2004 ones!