Quote:
Originally Posted by ratbastid
Guess what just came to light: Bush not only broke the law, he lied about it.
This is an excerpt from <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2004/04/20040420-2.html#">this April 20, 2004 speech</a>, conveniently posted on the White House website:
That's a lie. At the time he gave this speech, he had already given authorization for court-order-free wiretaps, and he intended to give more such authorizations.
Okay, you big Clinton-dragger-uppers: if lying about getting a blowjob is a high crime or misdemeanor, what do you call it when the President lies about violating his citizen's constitutionally-protected civil rights? Actually, Bush has skipped misdemeanors, and headed straight into felony territory.
Even if you DON'T believe he broke the law, you can't really deny the above public comment is clearly a lie, and about a gravely serious matter.
|
He did lie (proof above), and continues to lie, and it's time that someone heald him responsible for his lies. WE NEED TO GET THIS UNDER OATH. If that happpens, he's pretty much scewed. If someone has the balls to ask him to make a statement under oath and he lies, he's screwed. If he won't answer, he's screwed.