Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Ustwo
Ummm not at all. One thing has nothing to do with another, nor does it weaken the argument at hand in the slightest.
|
you don't think that ripping the number 2 official in the clinton DOJ for her part in the BS legislation that divided the intel and law enforcement allowing 9/11 to happen and then supporting her arguments about eavesdropping on US citizens while end running around FISA is counterproductive in the slightest?
Talk about breaking down contexts of arguments in to contexts of time periods combined with macro global conflicts in micro judicial definitions of legalities and illegalities as it concerns presidential powers according to the constitution etc. and blah blah blah.
are you a fan of chaos theory by chance?
__________________
"no amount of force can control a free man, a man whose mind is free. No, not the rack, not fission bombs, not anything. You cannot conquer a free man; the most you can do is kill him."
|