|
since when did nature tend to not exist? =.=
also, people try to disprove things using space and time because those are the most prevalent frames of reference in basic sciences. and people with any interest in objectionally debating god are probably interested in some way of a scientific view.
but i dont we're thinking of the same thing when i say "eternal", maybe we are for "infinite" though. im talking eternal not in the sense of a limitless amount of time, more like timelessness; a lack of relation to time. and im thinking infinite in the sense of lack of physical boundry, not lots and lots of something. it doesn't make sense to me to consider either "infinite" or "eternal" in the context of the things that they are opposites of (space and time). theyre not quantitative in my mind.
|