View Single Post
Old 12-21-2005, 12:05 AM   #6 (permalink)
Sty
Patron
 
Sty's Avatar
 
Administrator
Location: Tōkyō, Japan
Well, the easy explanation to this case is that he was sentenced for Life in Prison *WITH* the possibility of parole after 19 years

Quote:
Instead, Mr. Hamadi was put on trial in Frankfurt in 1989, found guilty of Mr. Stethem's murder, and sentenced to the maximum under the law of what was then West Germany, life in prison with the possibility of parole after 15 years.

---clip---

Normally in Germany, parole can be requested for people serving life sentences after 15 years in prison, but a court ruled that Mr. Hamadi would be eligible for parole only after serving 19 years.
This was just ordinary parole, with all respect to the Law.

Quote:
A spokeswoman for the Frankfurt prosecutor's office, Doris Möller-Scheu, said Mr. Hamadi's release after he had served 19 years, was a result of a normal, mandatory parole board review of his detention.

"Everything was O.K. with him, the prison evaluation, the psychologist's and the prosecutor's," Ms. Möller-Scheu said, explaining the reasons for the decision to grant Mr. Hamadi parole.
Justice is served, everything is fine. All sides satisfied, or are they?

Quote:
At the time of Mr. Hamadi's conviction, the United States expressed satisfaction at the outcome of the case, with the White House spokesman at the time, Marlin Fitzwater, saying, "Hamadi's sentence to life imprisonment satisfies the demand of justice and confirms that no cause or grievance excuses terrorism."

"We expect that Hamadi will serve the full sentence in accord with German law," Mr. Fitzwater said.
but enter the realities of today's world:

Quote:
But in Washington on Tuesday, Mr. McCormack said the United States was disappointed that Mr. Hamadi had not served out the entire term allowable by German law, which would have been 25 years.
Nice backpedalling, ne?

My opinion in this would be, as a non-US citizen, that he served his time and if the parole board agrees that he should be let go, then everybody should be happy. On the other hand, he should be kept under some surveillance and maybe barred from entering US ever. Your administration should choose that.

What I find distasteful is that there might be a manhunt going on now, in which he might get illegally snatched from the streets of Lebanon and brought to US where he can face a death sentence.

Original article: http://www.nytimes.com/2005/12/21/in...l?pagewanted=2
__________________
br,
Sty

I route, therefore you exist
Sty is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360