Quote:
|
Originally Posted by stevo
I guess while I was having a weekend this thread continued on. Thats good. I even missed a bannination, but from skimming over the poor guy was being attacked for his grammar, I didn't really think he was asking for it, but I don't really know the full story on him. Good luck to this week's rookie.
I've gone through and read from where I left off, and I've pretty much come to a conclusion. I feel the terrorists are more of a threat to me than my government. Others feel the government is more of a threat to them than terrorists. Then, others don't even believe terrorists exist. Then, others do, but his name is George Bush. I guess that sums it up, right?
|
It's not that easy, noone here said terrorists do not exist..... you're trying to persuade your audience with false presumptions and innuendoes my friend.
Easiest thing in the world was for Bush to get warrants, they even have a secret court for the president to do so. It would have been legal and noone could have done a damned thing about it.
Instead, he put himself ABOVE the law, even members in his own party are saying it, and in doing so he broke the law.
Again, I ask what of the rest of those who were tapped? Why did he not get the warrants? If these suspects were truly all "terrorists" then he would have had no problem getting the taps.
So, the questions that need to be answered and have to be answered is "why did you put yourself above the law, why did you not file for the warrants, Mr. President?"
Until he answers those truthfully and shows just cause, he broke the law, and this was far more damaging than a BJ.
Another question one could ask is, why was he so stupid in telling anyone he broke the law? My guess is that he believed nothing would be done to him and he bragged about it.