Quote:
|
Originally Posted by stevo
So I got one (1) response saying "yes, it was unconstitutional and he should be freed" and everyone else danced around the question. So lets try again. Should the admitted terrorist that admitted to plotting with al-qaeda to BLOW UP the brooklyn bridge be freed because the survaillance used to gather information on him was 'unconstitutional'??
|
Yes, that's the American way. That's the way it always has been and always should be.
I don't buy into the argument "the ends justify the means". That's bullshit.
If Bush broke the law by signing that particular executive order then he should pay the price just like every single American regardless of race, creed, religion, political group, etc.. This incident, coupled with the Patroit Act, has me more than a little concerned as to the direction this country is headed.