Quote:
|
Originally Posted by stevo
So I got one (1) response saying "yes, it was unconstitutional and he should be freed" and everyone else danced around the question. So lets try again. Should the admitted terrorist that admitted to plotting with al-qaeda to BLOW UP the brooklyn bridge be freed because the survaillance used to gather information on him was 'unconstitutional'??
|
absoultly yes. i'll say it. our country was founded on an individuals rights. our founding fathers spent a lot of time deciding the laws of this nation in order to protect it's citizens from the government. When the government starts infringing on the rights of citizens we need to make a statement to the government. So let him go, besides i would guess his life expetancy would be quite low after being freed. he crossed america and he crossed al-queda. he has no friends, only enemies.