why do I say I'm not suprised. Running count: 4 for free the terrorist. 0 for keep him locked up.
What about the constitutional rights of NYers who use the brooklyn bridge everyday?
Doesn't the declaration of independece name the first unalienable Right as life, then followed by liberty? Or is protecting the public less important to you than protecting a terrorist's "right" to not be spied on?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by pan6467
Now Stevo I answered you...... your turn to answer........
Why did Bush just not get warrants?????
|
I don't know, and it really doesn't bother me that much.
Quote:
|
And do we have proof (since there was no trial, and no tapes made public) that this Faris guy truly plotted anything?????
|
I don't know, but it doesn't bother me. Do you have proof that the government did this to deceive the public and just create a scare scenario in a vicious grab for power?
Quote:
|
What about everyone else tapped, I only see 1 example of why it was ok........ where are the other 499 or whatever names that the government tapped illegally?
|
I guess they weren't terrorists since they weren't hauled away and torchered into confessing. Because if they had been arrested, even if they had been innocent they would make stuff up to stop the pain. BUt since we didn't hear about 500 more confessions, we can safely assume they were never bothered.
Quote:
|
It's wrong..... I love how the Right cries about the loss of rights but in cases like this.... "it's ok".
|
what the right loves to cry about is the loss of life...unless of course that loss of life is punishment for causing the loss of someone elses life.
Quote:
|
And if Clinton had done this, would you still say the ends justifies the means?
|
you mean used the same tactics to uncover the 9/11 plot before so many Americans were killed? Yes, I would still say the ends justifies the means.