Originally Posted by samcol

You have picked such a horrible example to defend these roving wiretaps. First and foremost the guy was working FOR THE FBI. They knew who he was and what he was up and if they had any doubt on what side he was on they could of easily issued a warrant and had him arrested and done it the right way. Instead they choose to not only undermine the law, but use this guy as an EXAMPLE of how useful these wiretaps are. I don't even have to use a strawman, the argument for this using your own examples is so absurd.