Quote:
Originally Posted by stevo
So I got one (1) response saying "yes, it was unconstitutional and he should be freed" and everyone else danced around the question. So lets try again. Should the admitted terrorist that admitted to plotting with al-qaeda to BLOW UP the brooklyn bridge be freed because the survaillance used to gather information on him was 'unconstitutional'??
|
You have picked such a horrible example to defend these roving wiretaps. First and foremost the guy was working FOR THE FBI. They knew who he was and what he was up and if they had any doubt on what side he was on they could of easily issued a warrant and had him arrested and done it the right way. Instead they choose to not only undermine the law, but use this guy as an EXAMPLE of how useful these wiretaps are. I don't even have to use a strawman. Using your own examples, the argument for this is so absurd.