Quote:
|
Originally Posted by stevo
So I got one (1) response saying "yes, it was unconstitutional and he should be freed" and everyone else danced around the question. So lets try again. Should the admitted terrorist that admitted to plotting with al-qaeda to BLOW UP the brooklyn bridge be freed because the survaillance used to gather information on him was 'unconstitutional'??
|
Yes, beyond a shadow of a doubt. His Constitutional rights were violated.
Clear enough?
How many Mafiosas did we release because of this exact reason?
Sorry, if they had that strong of a case against him or any of the people they tapped ILLEGALLY, then they should have gone about it the legal way and gotten the warrants.
Bush took it upon himself not to obey the laws of the land and should be punished.
I truly see no defense for these actions, not when the law is clear and precise.