|
sorry ustwo, i can't agree with the ends justifying the means. The law is the law. If we overlook violations of the law, why did we have the law in the first place?
this is the slippery slope here. this is exactly what the founding fathers tried to prevent by checks and balances in the constitution because they were all too familiar with a head of state claiming it was for the good of the people/country.
__________________
"no amount of force can control a free man, a man whose mind is free. No, not the rack, not fission bombs, not anything. You cannot conquer a free man; the most you can do is kill him."
|