Quote:
Originally Posted by aceventura3
In the world I live in, when confronted with an enemy who wants to kill you, you either fight or die. I choose to fight. I don't trivialize the issue, to the contrary, you might say I take the issue too seriously because I beleive inaction will lead to more death when confronted with an enemy at war with you.
I think we were at war long before we actually invaded Iraq. Don't you agree?
What matters to me is defending my family, my life, liberty, and property. I will not do others harm if they respect what matters to me.
The instability in the Middle East is a threat, inaction will not solve the problem. Diplomacy failed. Economic sanctions failed. Trying to be nice failed. I am open to other alternatives, but no person or party has presented one.
Altering the course of history has always taken bold unpopular actions. If we maintain the courage to address the middle east perhaps our children won't have to.
Yes, I do stand with Bush. Not because of party, but because the problem needs to be addressed.
|
You say prehape's our children wont have to, yet it will be our children that pay the bill for this not us. The middle east has been UNSTABLE for generation upon generation, Bush does not have the power to change that. Just because a person wins does not make them right, and just because we go over there and try to establish democracy while killing over 30,000 innocents it deffinantly does not mean that the end justifies the means.