Quote:
|
Originally Posted by aceventura3
The instability in the Middle East is a threat, inaction will not solve the problem. Diplomacy failed. Economic sanctions failed. Trying to be nice failed. I am open to other alternatives, but no person or party has presented one.
Altering the course of history has always taken bold unpopular actions. If we maintain the courage to address the middle east perhaps our children won't have to.
Yes, I do stand with Bush. Not because of party, but because the problem needs to be addressed.
|
Nothing seems to solve the problems there. Other countries have gone in and tried to control the area, and they were eventually forced out or just left because it was too much trouble. The people were then left to themselves and they end up with either overly domineering dictators or an overly domineering group of religous leaders, and the people are back to square 1. And of course they wouldn't blame those leaders, or themselves.. it's always someone else. If it isnt Britain its the US, or the Jews.. never themselves.
What i would like to know is how many republicans would be taking the stands they're taking right now if GWB were a registered democrat?