|
Where does this idea that Bush isn't a "fake" come from?
Is it that he seems so dumb and innocent that you couldn't credit him or his advisors with anything so fiendish as fakery?
The man is a mess of contradictions and question marks:
- Why the uncertainty over his military record?
- Why the uncertainty as to whether he took drugs?
- Why the uncertainty as to whether he should have won the election?
- Why the uncertainty over the position of his friends in Enron, Haliburton and the rest?
- Why all the confussion in interviews when he lists his favourite books and is then unable to actually say what they are about?
Bush is no more a "what you see is what you get" guy than Clinton. Was it really a surprise when we found out about Monica? Will it really be a surprise when we find out that Bush has his fingers in a few corporate pies, hits the bottle again or is proven to in fact never have read a book that wasn;t about baseball in his life?
__________________
I've been 4thTimeLucky, you've been great. Goodnight and God bless!
|