The story appeared on Drudge and is on TSG.
The headline on Drudge was "
Quote:
|
Live 8 sues over 'intoxicated' and 'scantily clad' Anna Nicole Smith appearance at African aid concert...
|
The headline on TSG is
Intoxicated Anna Nicole Spurs Live 8 Suit
Apparently at the heart of the law suit is a loss of a good chunk of change, which is understandable why anyone would sue over that, but the TSG story starts out
Quote:
|
Claiming that an "intoxicated" and "scantily clad" Anna Nicole Smith marred this summer's Live 8 concert in Philadelphia...
|
How can a drunk and possibly almost naked Anna Nicole Smith detract from this or most events? This was a bad thing?
Ok, like I say, if it's a matter of money, and a healthy amount, by all means, sue. But to name these are part of your reasons? Doesn't that sort of go against the whole "sex, drugs and rock n roll" mentality?
Or just the idea that Anna is drunk and taking her clothes off?
I'm sure I'm missing something.