cyrnel

I didn't intend that meaning. Only that trust varies by question and interests.

But since you're asking, I do believe individuals have an obligation to contribute to the health of their community, even if only for self-interest. To guard the back door. Since one's community (or area of effect in this case) scales with wealth, a larger entity has a broader obligation that will have larger internal conflicts of interest.

I do expect the average wealthy person to have a better grasp of causes and effects but that says nothing of their ability or motives to manage beyond their interests. Back to the question. What trust are we talking about?

-Not a communist. Honest.

__________________
There are a vast number of people who are uninformed and heavily propagandized, but fundamentally decent. The propaganda that inundates them is effective when unchallenged, but much of it goes only skin deep. If they can be brought to raise questions and apply their decent instincts and basic intelligence, many people quickly escape the confines of the doctrinal system and are willing to do something to help others who are really suffering and oppressed." -Manufacturing Consent: Noam Chomsky and the Media, p. 195