Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community - View Single Post

Cimarron29414 · 12-01-2005, 10:33 AM

ArellaNova,

Wow! I am impressed! An IRA would be a great way for you to spread out your nest egg. Here is the layman's difference between a conventional and Roth IRA. First of all, Roth is the congressman that introduced this IRA type as a bill, hence the name. With a conventional IRA, the amount that you put in is tax free at the time you put it in. It is taxed when you take it out - hopefully that will be when you retire. With a Roth IRA, you are taxed as you put the money in. You are not taxed when you take it out. Now, some may think that the conventional IRA sounds like a good deal because it is a tax deferment. However, there is a MAJOR flaw in the logic. Let's do the math:

Let's say you put a lump sum of $8000 in a Roth IRA. You are taxed at your lowly "just starting out in life" rate of about 21%. So you end up putting in $6320 after paying $1680 in taxes.

Now, suppose you put the same lump sum if $8000 in a Conventional IRA. You are taxed 0% and end up putting in $8000.

Now, that amount grows at 7% for 40 years.

The Conventional grows to $130,000.
The Roth grows to only $103,000.

Now, you have to pay the piper for the Conventional at a brand new "I'm a rich mo-fo" tax bracket of 29%. So you take $37,700 from your $130K and are left with $92,300. Whereas with the Roth, you don't have to pay taxes (you already did) and you are left with $103,000. So, you have made $10,700 on the deal AND instead of giving the crooks in your government $37,700, you have only given them $1680.

Someone correct me if I am wrong...

12-01-2005, 10:33 AM	#3 (permalink)
Cimarron29414 Still Free Location: comfortably perched at the top of the bell curve!	ArellaNova, Wow! I am impressed! An IRA would be a great way for you to spread out your nest egg. Here is the layman's difference between a conventional and Roth IRA. First of all, Roth is the congressman that introduced this IRA type as a bill, hence the name. With a conventional IRA, the amount that you put in is tax free at the time you put it in. It is taxed when you take it out - hopefully that will be when you retire. With a Roth IRA, you are taxed as you put the money in. You are not taxed when you take it out. Now, some may think that the conventional IRA sounds like a good deal because it is a tax deferment. However, there is a MAJOR flaw in the logic. Let's do the math: Let's say you put a lump sum of $8000 in a Roth IRA. You are taxed at your lowly "just starting out in life" rate of about 21%. So you end up putting in $6320 after paying $1680 in taxes. Now, suppose you put the same lump sum if $8000 in a Conventional IRA. You are taxed 0% and end up putting in $8000. Now, that amount grows at 7% for 40 years. The Conventional grows to $130,000. The Roth grows to only $103,000. Now, you have to pay the piper for the Conventional at a brand new "I'm a rich mo-fo" tax bracket of 29%. So you take $37,700 from your $130K and are left with $92,300. Whereas with the Roth, you don't have to pay taxes (you already did) and you are left with $103,000. So, you have made $10,700 on the deal AND instead of giving the crooks in your government $37,700, you have only given them $1680. Someone correct me if I am wrong... __________________ Gives a man a halo, does mead. "Here lies The_Jazz: Killed by an ambitious, sparkly, pink butterfly."