Quote:
Originally Posted by xepherys
|
Hahahaha!!!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/26e6c/26e6cef6c0d44228964d81d5f33c18f6e1474b1a" alt="LOL"
Awesome graph. It does tell us that there were 17 pirates as of 2000. I wonder who they were.
Quote:
Originally Posted by xepherys
Again, I am not qualified to discuss the intelligence of Willravel. He seems to be a well adjusted individual that is able to have a good debate, so far as my experience in this thread is concerned. I do, however, think that many are not able to see through such a ruse. I pulled the wool over the eyes of more than one psychologist as a child. When my paretns divorced, after my dad died, during a period of depression. Realistically, psychology to some degree becomes a battle of smarts. Yes, they have training... but that training is only as good as how well they can use it.
|
Well thank you for the compliment. I agree that you seriously underestimate therepists. It is necessary for all people recieving their ba in psychology to take child psychology, and having taken that class, as well as several other child psychology classes, I can tell you that those in the class that didn't get it would never pass the board tests. In other words, those who are trying to become therepists that have not learned something as simple as children wanting approval froma adults would almost certianally not be able to practice psychology to the public. Some of the smartest people I know had to take the certification test several times. One thing you do have to remember: a psychologist is more likely to be able to help you if you are willing to be open. As you seemingly pulled the wool over your therepists eyes (on purpous?), it made the job of the therepist all the more difficult. I know that when the person in therepy is actively working against the therepist, it at the very least pospones any kind of help that you could get. It's possible that you needed to have therepy longer, or it's possible that you have the rare gulible therepist. In all likelyness, they got tired of you bsing them (therepists are people too).
Quote:
Originally Posted by xepherys
BTW, does anyone here watch TV? Ever see "That 70's Show"? Red talks about putting his boot up eric's ass all the time, and I've yet to hear even the MOST left wing PC advocate say that the show advocated child abuse. I think the wording is fairly common practice.
|
I have to say that most advocates have bigger fish to fry then Red on That 70s Show, but even if they had the time, it's nto as big of a deal because he never has actuially hit Eric (as, far as I know, I don't really watch that show). Usually his comments are less out of anger, and more with annyoance, in other words it's not a threat.